'A series of unfortunate events': a case report of infective endocarditis resulting from ventricular arrhythmia ablation.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most effective non-pharmacological approach in the reduction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence. However, it is crucial to thoroughly screen every patient for contraindications for RFA and provide appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis, if needed, since adverse effects may be fatal. Case summary: A 77-year-old male with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III), with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was admitted to our clinic due to recurrent life-threatening VT. The patient presented several concomitant diseases: dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease in Stage IIIB. He had a history of two myocardial infarctions and coronary artery bypass grafts complicated by mediastinitis and dehiscence of a sternotomy scar (2013). Radiofrequency ablation and pace mapping of VT were performed in sterile conditions, but no pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. There were no local or general complications in the post-operative period. The patient was discharged from the clinic in good condition. A week later, the patient suffered from septic shock and infective endocarditis of mitral valve complicated with infiltration of the ventricular septum, wall dissection of the left ventricle (LV), pseudoaneurysm, and abscess of the LV. At the time of the second hospitalization extensive dental carries were found and oral cavity sanitation was performed. Due to the severity of the condition, patient did not survive. Conclusion: Oral cavity infections are common but often overlooked, mainly when the RFA procedure is urgent. A thorough physical examination, including a dental check-up, is crucial to minimize the risk of potential infection of the endocardial tissue and maximize the benefits of the therapy. Still, it is possible that the myocardial infection was not a result of oral cavity infection but a result of other undiagnosed and untreated infection. Contamination of the procedure site with patients' own microbiota or foreign microorganisms by the medical personnel is also a likely and unfortunate scenario. The presented case highlights the significance of not only prophylaxis, screening, and treatment of possible inflammation sites before RFA but also the need for sustaining sanitary standards and sterile conditions.

Performance of the PRIMaCY sudden death risk prediction model for childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: implications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decision-making.

AIMS: The validated HCM Risk-Kids model provides accurate individualized estimates of sudden cardiac death risk in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). A second validated model, PRIMaCY, also provides individualized estimates of risk, but its performance and clinical impact has not been independently investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of using the PRIMaCY sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk model in childhood HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: The estimated 5-year SCD risk was calculated for children meeting diagnostic criteria for HCM in a large single-centre cohort using PRIMaCY (clinical and genetic) and HCM Risk-Kids model, and model performance was assessed. Three hundred one patients [median age 10 (interquartile range 4-14)] were followed up for an average of 4.9 (±3.8) years, during which 30 (10.0%) reached the SCD or equivalent event endpoint. Harrell's C-statistic for the clinical and genetic models was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.8] and 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.80) with a calibration slope of 0.19 (95% CI 0.04-0.54) and 0.26 (95% CI -0.03-0.62), respectively. The number needed to treat to potentially treat one life-threatening arrhythmia for the PRIMaCY clinical, PRIMaCY genetic, and HCM Risk-Kids models was 13.7, 14.5, and 9.4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although PRIMaCY has a similar discriminatory ability to that reported for HCM Risk-Kids, estimated risk estimates did not correlate well with observed risk. A higher proportion of patients met implantable cardioverter-defibrillator thresholds using PRIMaCY model compared with HCM Risk-Kids. This has important clinical implications as these patients will be exposed to a lifetime risk of complications and inappropriate therapies.

Salvage re-irradiation in non-melanoma skin cancers: A multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We conducted a multicentre real-world study to assess the outcomes of radical salvage re-irradiation for non-melanoma skin cancer (nMSC) recurrences following definitive or postoperative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients treated between 2006 and 2022 with re-irradiation for nMSCs were retrospectively collected from five high-volume brachytherapy centers. The primary endpoint was local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were utilised in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with a median age of 78.4 years with recurrences of previously irradiated nMSC in the head and neck region were included in the analysis. The majority had cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC; 91.4%), and were irradiated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT; 91.4%). The most common locations included the nasal region (36.2%) and external ear (18.9%). The 1-year LC was 73.1% and decreased to 41.7% at three years. The size of the re-irradiated lesion was the single independent prognostic factor in Cox analysis (per mm; HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.11; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or worse AEs were reported in 7 cases (12.1%). CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation for nMSCs, predominantly administered with brachytherapy for radiorecurrent BCC, is associated with high recurrence rates, and the risk of failure significantly increases with the size of the treated lesion. Re-irradiation could be an option for selected elderly patients with small, localised, inoperable recurrences after RT to achieve local control or defer systemic treatment; however, prospective trials are necessary to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Clinical Application of the HCM-AF Risk Score in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes of Polish Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The recently introduced HCM-AF Risk Calculator allows the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical application of the HCM-AF Risk Score in the prediction of the clinical outcomes of Polish patients. The study included 92 patients (50.0% female, median age 55 years), with a baseline sinus rhythm diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The analysis involved the incidence of clinical characteristics and outcomes, total mortality, rehospitalisation, and the course of heart failure (HF). According to the HCM-AF Risk Score, the HCM population was stratified into three subgroups, with a low (13/14.2%), intermediate (30/32.6%), and high risk of AF (49/53.2%). Subgroups differed significantly: the high-risk subgroup was older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and more advanced signs of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and left atrium (LA) dilatation. The registered AF incidence was 31.5% and 43.5% in the 2- and 5-year follow-ups, and it was significantly higher than in the HCM-AF Risk Score population, which had 4.6% in the 2-year follow-up, and 10.7% in the 5-year follow-up. In the whole population, the AF incidence in both the 2- and 5-year follow-ups revealed a strong correlation with the HCM-AF Risk Score (r = 0.442, p < 0.001; r = 0.346, p < 0.001, respectively). The clinical outcomes differed among the subgroups: the total mortality was 15.4% vs. 20.0% vs. 42.9% (p < 0.05); rehospitalisation was 23.1% vs. 53.3% vs. 71.4% (p < 0.05). The highest HF progression was in the high-risk subgroup (36.7%). Regardless of the high results of the HCM-Risk Score in Polish patients, the score underestimates the real-life high level of AF incidence. The HCM-AF Risk Score seems to be useful in the prediction of the general clinical outcomes in HCM patients.

Autoimmune Hepatitis-Challenging Diagnosis.

The incidence of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) increases worldwide. If undiagnosed, it may progress end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, there is no characteristic clinical presentation of this disease, which makes the illness hard to recognize. A case report illustrates the difficulties of diagnosing the patient during his two hospitalizations and his final treatment with prednisolone which improved the patient's condition.

ARNI in HFrEF-One-Centre Experience in the Era before the 2021 ESC HF Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has demonstrated a survival benefit and reduces heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, our experience in this field is limited. This study aimed to summarize a real clinical practice of the use of ARNI in HFrEF patients hospitalized due to HFrEF in the era before the 2021 ESC HF recommendations, as well as assess their clinical outcome with regard to ARNI administration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Overall, 613 patients with HFrEF hospitalized in 2018-2020 were enrolled into a retrospective one-centre cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into patients receiving (82/13.4%) and not-receiving (531/82.6%) ARNI. Clinical outcomes defined as rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations, time to the first rehospitalization and death from any cause were analysed in the 1-2 year follow-up in the ARNI and non-ARNI groups, matched as to age and LVEF. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics revealed the following differences between ARNI and non-ARNI groups: A higher percentage of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) (p = 0.014) and defibrillators with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) (p = 0.038), higher frequency of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.002) and history of stroke (p = 0.024) were in the ARNI group. The percentage of patients with HFrEF NYHA III/IV presented an increasing trend to be higher in the ARNI (64.1%) as compared to the non-ARNI group (51.5%, p = 0.154). Incidence of rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations and time to the first rehospitalization were comparable between the groups. There were no differences between the numbers of deaths of any cause in the ARNI (28%) and non-ARNI (28%) groups. The independent negative predictor of death in the whole population of ARNI and non-ARNI groups was the coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (beta= -0.924, HR 0.806, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Our current positive experience in ARNI therapy is limited to extremely severe patients with HFrEF. Regardless of the more advanced HF and HF comorbidities, the patients treated with ARNI presented similar mortality and rehospitalizations as the patients treated by standard therapy.

Total Occlusion of the Infarct-Related Artery in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)-How Can We Identify These Patients?

Background and Objectives: Regardless of the improvement in key recommendations in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), the prevalence of total occlusion (TO) of infarct-related artery (IRA), and the impact of TO of IRA on outcomes in patients with NSTEMI, remain unclear. Aim: The study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of TO of IRA in patients with NSTEMI, and its clinical significance. Material and Methods: The study was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 399 consecutive patients with NSTEMI (293 male, mean age: 71 ± 10.1 years) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The study population was categorized into patients with TO and non-TO of IRA on coronary angiography. In-hospital and one-year mortality were analyzed. Results: TO of IRA in the NSTEMI population occurred in 138 (34.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent predictors of TO of IRA: left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio (OR) 0.949, p < 0.001); family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 2.652, p < 0.001); and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level (OR 0.972, p = 0.002). In-hospital and one-year mortality were significantly higher in the TO group than the non-TO group (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.007 and 18.1% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). The independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at admission (OR 0.768, p = 0.004); and TO of IRA (OR 1.863, p = 0.005). Conclusions: In the population of patients with NSTEMI, TO of IRA represents a considerably frequent phenomenon, and corresponds with impaired outcomes. Therefore, the utmost caution should be paid to prevent delay of coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function, metabolic disturbances, and a family history of CAD, who are at increased risk of TO of IRA.